President Sánchez has publicly announced his decision to reflect on the personal and familial cost and meaning of continuing as the President of the Government. The author refrains from entering this reflection or evaluating it but believes it is important that everyone reflect on the cost and meaning of a political debate that has become common and, for some, central to their way of doing politics. The politics is the public discussion of alternatives, as democracy entails accepting that one’s own options may not be the best or the only possible ones. However, political decisions are debatable by nature and often capable of improvement and integration.
Criticism of political decisions is often made not from the recognition of their legitimacy and the possibility of political alternatives, but rather through the vehement denial and disqualification of the opposing party. This style of politics aims solely at removing the incumbent government and taking its place, rather than acknowledging citizens’ concerns, defending one’s own options, or integrating them with those of other political forces to shape current decisions. This approach does not contribute to the democratic process but rather serves the purpose of solely gaining power for the future at the cost of a healthy political discourse.
The author expresses a belief that not all politicians or political forces are the same, with some bearing a greater responsibility for the degradation of political debate. However, she emphasizes the need for all individuals to seek ways to overcome this situation, rather than singling out specific individuals responsible for it. Turning political debate into constant false accusations of illegalities and villainous acts, including attacks on politicians’ personal and family lives, undermines genuine political discourse and damages democracy by alienating citizens from constructive politics focused on policies and respect for opposing views.
In a society inundated with information, the responsibility of the media to prevent misinformation and manipulation is crucial to maintaining a healthy political environment. The author echoes Raimon Obiols in emphasizing the importance of distinguishing between truth and falsehood, as failure to do so can lead to the deterioration of the political landscape. She advocates for a politics based on mutual respect and recognition of opposing views, with a willingness to offer constructive criticism, improve decisions, and propose alternative solutions.
The author believes that President Sánchez’s reflection, regardless of its outcome, can serve as an opportunity to reclaim a politics free from mutual delegitimization and rooted in respect for others. Building on a foundation of recognizing the other, offering constructive criticism, and being open to alternative viewpoints can lead to a political discourse focused on improvement and democratic decision-making. The author expresses confidence in a Parliament composed of political forces committed to this type of politics and united in defending it, in order to counter the degradation of politics and uphold democratic values.
In conclusion, the author underscores the importance of defending a politics grounded in respect, constructive dialogue, and consensus-building to counteract destructive practices. By coming together as citizens and political representatives in defense of such politics, it is possible to prevent the erosion of democratic principles and ensure a future built on collaboration and mutual understanding.
