The federal government’s decision not to convert an empty 500-bed facility in Pinkenba into crisis accommodation has left local politicians and service providers devastated. In response, Queensland Housing Minister Meaghan Scanlon expressed disappointment as the State Government had been working towards a proposal for the site since 2023. The lack of amenities and support services at the facility raised concerns about the suitability of the site for vulnerable communities, despite the perception that any offer of shelter should be gratefully accepted.
Micah Projects chief executive Karyn Walsh argued against the suitability of the Pinkenba site for crisis accommodation. She highlighted issues such as the lack of kitchen and laundry facilities, uncertainty over costs, distance from health services, and inadequate transport infrastructure. Walsh emphasized the need for secure tenancy rather than temporary crisis accommodation. Some individuals prefer living in tents near essential services rather than accepting inadequate facilities. Walsh also pointed out the importance of understanding the needs of people experiencing trauma, addiction, and health issues, suggesting a supportive housing model like Common Ground in South Brisbane.
Concerns were raised about the potential environment at Pinkenba for people living in crisis accommodation, as not everyone may be comfortable in a large communal setting. The logistics of managing a group of 500 individuals were highlighted as a challenge, particularly for individuals with complex needs. The suggestion to accommodate women and children escaping domestic violence at Pinkenba was also met with skepticism, as the location and lack of appropriate support services may not be conducive to their needs. The idea of sending perpetrators of violence to such a facility was considered more appropriate.
Walsh emphasized the importance of understanding and respecting the needs of unhoused individuals and not simply offering a bed without considering their specific requirements. She stressed the need for realistic solutions that address long-term housing security rather than temporary crisis accommodation. The conversation around Pinkenba highlighted the complexity of addressing homelessness and providing suitable support services for vulnerable communities. The dissatisfaction with the federal government’s decision reflected broader concerns about the adequacy of current responses to housing crises and the needs of unhoused individuals.
