Britain’s plan to deport asylum-seekers to Rwanda has faced criticism from international humanitarian groups, including the U.N. and the Council of Europe, over concerns about human rights and potential harm to global cooperation on addressing the migrant crisis. Despite opposition attempts to amend the legislation, it was ultimately passed by Parliament, paving the way for deportation flights to Rwanda. U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees Filippo Grandi expressed disappointment in the U.K.’s departure from its tradition of providing refuge to those in need, stressing the importance of all countries upholding their obligations to protect refugees.
The Council of Europe’s commissioner for human rights, Michael O’Flaherty, also raised concerns about the legislation preventing asylum-seekers from seeking court intervention when facing deportation. These critiques come as French authorities reported the deaths of at least five migrants in the English Channel, highlighting the risks faced by those attempting to enter Britain by sea. The U.K. government, led by Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, believes that deportation plans will deter migrants from making dangerous crossings, thus addressing concerns about illegal immigration and small boat arrivals. Sunak has made stopping the influx of migrants a key campaign promise in the face of mounting political challenges.
The number of migrants arriving in Britain via small boats has increased significantly over the past few years, contributing to the public perception of the government’s failure to control immigration. The decision to send some asylum-seekers to Rwanda is part of a broader strategy to address this issue, with the hope that it will dissuade migrants from making risky journeys across the English Channel. While the plan has been met with opposition from humanitarian organizations, the U.K. government sees it as a necessary step to address the escalating migrant crisis.
Former Prime Minister Boris Johnson initially proposed the plan to send asylum-seekers to Rwanda over two years ago, aiming to strike a deal with the East African nation in exchange for financial aid. Although the implementation of the plan has faced legal challenges and opposition from migrant advocates, the approval of the Safety of Rwanda Bill marks a significant milestone in its advancement. Under the new legislation, deportees will have the opportunity to apply for asylum in Rwanda but will not be permitted to return to Britain, aligning with the government’s efforts to tighten immigration policies and reduce illegal crossings.
Despite concerns raised by international organizations about the human rights implications of the deportation plan, the Rwandan government has welcomed the approval of the legislation. The government spokesperson highlighted Rwanda’s commitment to creating a safe and secure environment for asylum-seekers, building on the progress made since the country’s devastating genocide three decades ago. The bill’s approval reflects the U.K.’s continued partnership with Rwanda on migration and economic development, signaling a step towards implementing the long-discussed plan to relocate asylum-seekers to the East African nation.
