Summarize this content to 2000 words in 6 paragraphs
Russian President Vladimir Putin agreed in a phone call with U.S. President Donald Trump on Tuesday to pause strikes on Ukrainian energy infrastructure, but their highly anticipated conversation failed to produce a broader ceasefire agreement.
The U.S. and Russian leaders spoke for more than 90 minutes, with both expressing hopes of improving relations between their countries. However, Putin did not agree to Washington’s proposed 30-day ceasefire covering the entire war.
The Kremlin said Putin had ordered his military to halt attacks on Ukraine’s energy infrastructure for 30 days, while the White House stated that “leaders agreed that the movement to peace will begin with an energy and infrastructure ceasefire.”
In Kyiv, President Volodymyr Zelensky said he supported the limited ceasefire, but added that he believes Putin’s refusal to agree to a broader deal indicated that the Russian leader was not “ready” for peace and still seeks to “weaken” Ukraine.
Trump insisted on his Truth Social network they had “an understanding that we will be working quickly to have a Complete Ceasefire and, ultimately, an END to this very horrible War.”
However, the Kremlin said in a statement that a “key condition” for peace would be a “complete end” of Western military and intelligence support to Ukraine’s embattled military — demands that both Ukraine and its Western allies would find hard to accept.
news
Takeaways from Trump-Putin Call
Read more
Before the call, Trump had suggested he was open to discussing “dividing up certain assets” — a reference to what parts of occupied Ukraine Russia might be allowed to keep.
On his Truth Social platform, Trump claimed that “many elements of a final agreement have been agreed to, but much remains” to be settled.
U.S. allies, wary of Trump’s overtures toward Russia, fear he may concede too much to Putin, whom he has repeatedly praised.
Ukraine, which had already accepted Washington’s proposal for a 30-day halt in fighting, urged Moscow to “unconditionally” agree to the ceasefire.
“It is time for Russia to show whether it really wants peace,” Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha said ahead of the call.
But Putin, who has repeatedly emphasized the need for further negotiations, appeared unwilling to commit to a broader halt in hostilities.
Earlier Tuesday, before speaking with Trump, Putin delivered a combative speech criticizing the West, warning that sanctions would remain in place regardless of any peace deal. He also mocked the G7 — from which Russia was expelled in 2018 — as “too small to see on a map,” drawing applause from his audience.
news
Russia Open to Western Companies’ Return, Officials Say, But on Moscow’s Terms
Read more
Zelensky has warned that Putin is not genuinely seeking peace but rather using negotiations to improve Russia’s battlefield position.
Russia has maintained relentless drone and missile attacks on Ukraine for more than three years, occupying around 20% of its territory and making incremental gains in recent months.
The Kremlin has also touted a Russian counteroffensive in the Kursk region, parts of which Ukraine seized last year in an attempt to gain leverage for negotiations.
Trump first initiated direct contact with Putin in February, breaking with Western efforts to isolate the Russian leader. The move was followed by a heated televised exchange between Trump and Zelensky in the Oval Office on Feb. 28, after which the U.S. temporarily suspended military aid to Ukraine.
On Sunday, Trump suggested his conversation with Putin would focus on issues related to “land” and “power plants” — a possible reference to the Russian-occupied Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant.
Trump has made ending the war in Ukraine a key election promise, blaming his predecessor Joe Biden’s policies for prolonging the war.
“It must end NOW,” he wrote on Truth Social.
A Message from The Moscow Times:
Dear readers,
We are facing unprecedented challenges. Russia’s Prosecutor General’s Office has designated The Moscow Times as an “undesirable” organization, criminalizing our work and putting our staff at risk of prosecution. This follows our earlier unjust labeling as a “foreign agent.”
These actions are direct attempts to silence independent journalism in Russia. The authorities claim our work “discredits the decisions of the Russian leadership.” We see things differently: we strive to provide accurate, unbiased reporting on Russia.
We, the journalists of The Moscow Times, refuse to be silenced. But to continue our work, we need your help.
Your support, no matter how small, makes a world of difference. If you can, please support us monthly starting from just $2. It’s quick to set up, and every contribution makes a significant impact.
By supporting The Moscow Times, you’re defending open, independent journalism in the face of repression. Thank you for standing with us.
Continue
Not ready to support today? Remind me later.
×
Remind me next month
Thank you! Your reminder is set.
We will send you one reminder email a month from now. For details on the personal data we collect and how it is used, please see our Privacy Policy.
