Federal prosecutors are seeking a 40-year prison sentence for David DePape, who attacked Paul Pelosi, the husband of former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. Prosecutors argue that the violent nature of the offense warrants a longer sentence than the 25 years recommended by the U.S. Probation Office. They believe a terrorism enhancement should be applied due to DePape’s intention to promote a federal crime of terrorism. The sentencing is set for May 17, with prosecutors emphasizing the need for a deterrent to prevent similar crimes in the future.
DePape was convicted in November of attempted kidnapping of a federal official and assaulting an immediate family member of an elected official. He broke into the Pelosis’ California home and attacked Paul Pelosi with a hammer, causing him to suffer a fractured skull. Body cam footage showed DePape asking for Nancy Pelosi and threatening to break her kneecaps. During the trial, DePape’s defense did not deny the attack but argued that he did not intend to kidnap anyone and his actions were not related to Pelosi’s government role. DePape also faces state charges of attempted murder and assault with a deadly weapon.
The case highlights a concerning trend of attacks and threats against public and elected officials. In 2023, the number of threat assessment cases handled by the U.S. Capitol Police increased, indicating a growing risk to the safety of members of Congress. Rep. Angie Craig was attacked in Washington, D.C., and other politicians have been victims of swatting incidents, where false emergency calls prompt police responses to their homes. Prosecutors hope that DePape’s sentencing will serve as a deterrent to individuals harboring violent ideological plans.
Prosecutors argue that DePape’s case presents an opportunity to send a clear message to others who may be considering similar acts of violence. They stress the importance of punishing violent ideological attacks to the full extent of the law. The filing emphasizes the need for a significant sentence to deter individuals with extremist motives from targeting public officials. The sentencing decision will play a crucial role in setting a precedent for addressing acts of violence and threats against elected officials.
DePape’s defense attorney has not commented on the case, and Nancy Pelosi’s office has yet to respond to requests for comment. The attack on Paul Pelosi highlights the vulnerability of elected officials and their families to targeted violence. It underscores the importance of addressing threats against members of Congress and ensuring their safety and security. As the sentencing date approaches, the outcome of DePape’s case will be closely watched for its implications on deterring future attacks on public figures and holding perpetrators accountable for their actions.
