The author examines the challenges facing Democratic leadership in some of the bluest parts of the country, particularly on the West Coast, where issues such as homelessness, crime, and dysfunction persist. Despite the progressive values held by these regions, the outcomes often fall short of expectations. While the author concedes that there are failures in governance in some blue states, he argues that overall, liberal states have seen faster economic growth and higher living standards compared to conservative states. He suggests that the problem lies not with liberalism itself, but with West Coast liberalism specifically.
The West Coast, particularly California and Oregon, has some of the highest rates of unsheltered homelessness and other indicators of social issues compared to other blue states in the Northeast. Despite progressive values, issues such as mental health services, drug overdoses, and high school graduation rates are worse in some West Coast states. The author questions whether West Coast liberalism lacks the focus on rigorous evidence and oversight necessary to address these complex problems effectively.
The author reflects on his own experiences running for governor in Oregon and engaging with liberal donors in Portland, where he observed a lack of focus on practical governance and outcomes. He highlights examples of well-intentioned efforts, such as bail funds for people of color, that may have unintended consequences, such as contributing to violent crimes. He argues that the West Coast is infected with ideological purity that prioritizes intentions over outcomes, leading to ineffective policies.
The author suggests that ideological purity and lack of political competition in the West Coast may contribute to governance failures and the persistence of social issues. He points out that the absence of a strong Republican presence in many West Coast states allows Democrats to move further left without accountability. By contrast, states in the Northeast with more political diversity may have more balanced governance and better outcomes. The lack of opposition oversight can result in slow response to critical issues, such as mental health crises.
Acknowledging failures in West Coast liberalism, the author emphasizes the need for pragmatism and humility in addressing governance challenges. He notes that there are signs of self-correction, with efforts taken in California and Oregon to address housing shortages and homelessness. The author remains optimistic about the potential for the West Coast to reinvent itself, citing historical examples of innovation and adaptation. He calls for less purity and more pragmatic approaches to governance in order to improve outcomes for residents of the region.
In conclusion, the author highlights the importance of addressing the disconnect between values and outcomes in West Coast liberalism. He advocates for a shift towards more pragmatic and evidence-based policies to effectively tackle social issues such as homelessness, mental health, and crime. By embracing humility and a willingness to acknowledge failures, the author believes that the West Coast can overcome its governance challenges and continue to thrive as a region known for innovation and progress.
