A man from Ohio, Joshua Russell, was sentenced to 2 1/2 years in prison for making death threats against Arizona Governor Katie Hobbs during the 2020 election season. Russell pleaded guilty to a federal charge of making an interstate threat against Hobbs, who had faced numerous threats for her role in certifying Joe Biden’s victory in Arizona. U.S. District Judge Steven Logan commended Russell for undergoing substance abuse treatment but stated that his actions had traumatized people in the secretary of state’s office. The judge read aloud Russell’s profanity-laden threats and rejected his claim that they were immature, emphasizing the severity of the threats.
Hobbs was not present in court during the sentencing hearing, but the threats made against her were part of a larger pattern of harassment and intimidation against her and other election officials. The U.S. Justice Department’s Election Threats Task Force has been investigating and prosecuting cases involving threats of violence against elected officials, workers, and volunteers to ensure the integrity of elections. Several other cases, including one involving a man from Massachusetts who made a threat to bomb Hobbs’ office, have resulted in prison sentences, underscoring the seriousness of such actions.
Russell’s voicemails to Hobbs included explicit threats and accusations of treason, creating deep fear and apprehension among Hobbs and her colleagues. The prosecutors had recommended a 2 1/2 year prison sentence, emphasizing the need to deter similar threats in the future and protect election workers. Russell’s lawyer argued for probation, citing his client’s regret and struggles with substance abuse and mental health issues. In a document submitted to the court, Russell described his state of mind at the time of the threats, citing depression, anger, and isolation fueled by drug use.
Despite expressing remorse in court and through a letter of apology to Hobbs, Russell was ultimately sentenced to prison by Judge Logan. The judge suggested that Russell educate himself on the U.S. Constitution and the importance of free and fair elections while serving his sentence. The case highlights the impact of threats and intimidation on elected officials and workers involved in the electoral process, emphasizing the need for accountability and consequences for those who engage in such behavior. As the Justice Department continues to prosecute cases of election-related threats, the message remains clear that such actions will not be tolerated and will be met with legal repercussions.
