William Curlis, a 76-year-old man who has served as treasurer for numerous political campaigns in Ohio over the past 40 years, is facing federal wire fraud charges for allegedly stealing nearly $1 million from clients. He is accused of writing checks from campaign accounts to himself for personal use and taking steps to hide the thefts, with an alleged total theft of $995,231 between 2008 and June 2023. A plea agreement has been filed in the case, indicating Curlis’ commitment to accepting responsibility and remorse for his actions, although additional details have not been disclosed at this time.
Curlis’ attorney, Mark Collins, has stated that Curlis has admitted to his wrongdoings and that further information will be revealed once the case progresses through the federal system. Curlis served as treasurer for over 100 Republican campaigns, often as the sole signatory on accounts. He allegedly wrote numerous checks to himself from candidates’ campaign funds and a PAC fund while serving as treasurer, and also transferred funds between accounts without the candidates’ knowledge in an attempt to conceal the thefts. Additionally, he falsified corresponding campaign finance reports to cover up his actions.
In an effort to cover up the account deficits caused by his theft, Curlis reportedly sold his home in 2016 to cover campaign expenses. The case is ongoing and it is expected that more details will emerge as it progresses through the federal system. Curlis’ alleged actions have raised concerns about the oversight and management of campaign finances, as he was able to deceive numerous campaigns over a span of several decades. The case serves as a reminder of the importance of transparency and accountability in political fundraising and financial management.
The allegations against Curlis highlight the potential vulnerabilities in campaign finance systems and the need for thorough oversight and regulation to prevent fraudulent activity. Campaign treasurers play a crucial role in managing finances and ensuring compliance with regulations, making it essential for campaigns to implement proper checks and balances to deter and detect fraudulent behavior. As the case continues to unfold, it will likely prompt further scrutiny of campaign financial practices and may lead to changes in the way campaigns manage their finances.
The plea agreement filed in Curlis’ case suggests that he is cooperating with authorities and taking steps to address his actions. However, the full extent of the consequences he will face remains to be seen as the case progresses. The case serves as a cautionary tale for individuals involved in political campaigns and underscores the importance of maintaining ethical standards in financial management. Ultimately, the outcome of Curlis’ case will likely have broader implications for campaign finance regulations and practices, potentially leading to increased scrutiny and oversight in the future.
