The nominee Adeel Mangi, who could become the first Muslim American to serve as a federal appellate court judge, is facing backlash from law enforcement groups that are threatening his confirmation. Despite his impressive legal background and prestigious law firm work, his involvement with two outside groups has raised concerns among some lawmakers. The Alliance of Families for Justice in particular has been scrutinized due to its affiliation with individuals like Kathy Boudin, who had a controversial criminal history. Law enforcement groups have expressed opposition to Mangi, citing an alleged anti-police bias that could influence his decisions if appointed to the bench.
As a result of the opposition from law enforcement groups, several Democrats including Senators Joe Manchin, Jacky Rosen, and Catherine Cortez Masto, have come out against Mangi’s confirmation. This means that Mangi will likely need bipartisan support to secure his nomination, which remains uncertain at this point. While he has denied having an anti-police bias, some Republican senators remain unconvinced and have expressed skepticism about his fitness for a judicial appointment. Despite efforts from the White House to defend Mangi’s nomination and emphasize his qualifications, the confirmation process is facing challenges.
Mangi has defended his work with the Alliance of Families for Justice, explaining that he was initially involved in a pro bono lawsuit that led to important reforms in a correctional facility in New York. He clarified that his role was limited to specific legal matters and he did not engage in further litigation through referrals from the group. Additionally, he highlighted support from other law enforcement organizations, which have endorsed his nomination and praised his commitment to upholding the rule of law and promoting public safety.
Criticism of Mangi’s nomination has also come from some Jewish groups, who have raised concerns about his past affiliation with the Center for Security, Race, and Rights at Rutgers University. Republicans have attempted to link him to remarks made by other members of the center that they view as antisemitic. However, Mangi has stated that he was unaware of these comments and should not be held responsible for the views expressed by others at the center. The Anti-Defamation League has come to his defense, denouncing the excessive scrutiny of his faith during the confirmation process.
The Senate Judiciary Committee narrowly approved Mangi’s nomination in January on a party-line vote, but he has since faced increased opposition. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has been vocal in his criticism of Mangi, questioning his judgment and integrity in joining organizations with controversial ties. Supporters of Mangi argue that he is being unfairly targeted due to his religious background, accusing some lawmakers of bias against Muslim Americans. The outcome of Mangi’s nomination remains uncertain as he continues to navigate through a contentious confirmation process.
