Migration experts and representatives from various organizations recently testified before the Bundestag on the impact of social benefits on migration to Germany. Studies have shown that the level of social benefits does not have a significant influence on migration decisions. Instead, factors such as job opportunities and living conditions play a more important role. The proposal to reduce social benefits for asylum seekers was met with criticism, with experts stating that the focus should be on improving wages and working conditions to attract more skilled workers to Germany.
The Chairman of the German Landkreistag welcomed the introduction of payment cards for asylum seekers and the delay in equalizing benefits for rejected asylum seekers with local unemployed individuals. However, legal experts warned that reducing the minimum standard of living for deportees could be unconstitutional. They emphasized the need for political decision-making in determining social benefit levels, rather than relying on legal interpretations.
The issue of social benefits for asylum seekers has sparked debate on a European level, with calls for harmonization of benefits across EU member states. However, the feasibility of such a proposal remains uncertain, as countries with lower standards may resist raising them to comply with EU regulations. Despite the challenges, experts believe that a European solution to the issue of varying social benefits could help reduce secondary migration within the EU and provide a more consistent approach to asylum policies.
Legal experts highlighted the need for a comprehensive reform of EU asylum laws, including the abolishment of multiple asylum applications and the establishment of a system where asylum seekers only receive benefits in the country responsible for their application. The recent EU asylum reform, which is still pending approval by the EU Parliament, does not address these core issues. Efforts to prohibit multiple asylum applications have faced challenges, indicating the need for further reforms to create a more efficient and equitable asylum system in the EU.
Overall, the discussion on social benefits and migration in Germany and the EU has highlighted the complexities of asylum policies and the need for a more coordinated approach to address the root causes of migration. While the focus on social benefits has sparked debate, experts emphasize the importance of addressing broader issues such as job opportunities and integration to create a more sustainable and effective immigration system. The future of asylum policies in Europe will likely depend on the ability of policymakers to find common ground and develop solutions that prioritize the well-being of asylum seekers while also meeting the needs of host countries.
