The “rain metaphor” refers to the idea that just because someone does not get wet from rain falling out of the sky does not mean that they are not getting wet from the rain that is being poured on them. In the context of Trump’s hush money trial, this metaphor is being used by the prosecution to argue that even though Trump may not have directly handled the hush money payments, he was aware of them and benefitted from them. The prosecution is trying to establish that Trump was aware of and involved in the scheme to pay off Stormy Daniels and Karen McDougal to keep them silent about their alleged affairs with him.
Jackson explains that the prosecution is trying to make the case that Trump was fully aware of the payments being made to the women and the reasons behind them. They are arguing that even though Trump did not physically make the payments himself, he was involved in the decision-making process and benefited from the payments. By using the “rain metaphor,” the prosecution is trying to show that even though Trump may not have been directly involved in the transactions, he was aware of what was happening and was complicit in the scheme.
The prosecution is building their case around the idea that Trump was an active participant in the hush money payments, despite his denials. They are presenting evidence that shows Trump’s involvement in the decision-making process and his knowledge of the payments being made to the women. The prosecution is arguing that Trump’s actions, or lack thereof, make him culpable in the scheme and that he should be held accountable for his role in the alleged criminal activity.
Jackson points out that the prosecution is also trying to establish a pattern of behavior on Trump’s part when it comes to silencing people who could potentially damage his reputation. They are presenting evidence of other instances where Trump allegedly used hush money payments to silence individuals who had damaging information about him. By demonstrating a pattern of behavior, the prosecution is trying to show that Trump’s involvement in the hush money payments to Stormy Daniels and Karen McDougal was not an isolated incident, but part of a larger pattern of behavior.
Overall, Jackson emphasizes that the prosecution’s use of the “rain metaphor” in Trump’s hush money trial is a powerful tool in helping the jury understand the complex nature of the case. By using this metaphor, the prosecution is able to illustrate the concept of indirect involvement and complicity in a clear and relatable way. Jackson believes that the prosecution’s strategy of using this metaphor will help them make a strong case against Trump and prove that he was aware of and involved in the hush money payments to the women. As the trial continues, it will be interesting to see how the defense responds to the prosecution’s arguments and whether the jury will ultimately find Trump guilty of the charges against him.
