In a lawsuit filed in circuit court in Collier County, Florida, “Judge Judy” Sheindlin has sued the parent company of the National Enquirer and InTouch Weekly for publishing a story that falsely claimed she was trying to help the Menendez brothers get a retrial after they were convicted of murdering their parents. The story was first published on InTouch Weekly’s website on April 10 under the headline “Inside Judge Judy’s Quest to Save the Menendez Brothers Nearly 35 Years After Their Parents’ Murder” and later appeared in the National Enquirer, both owned by Accelerate360 Media. Sheindlin emphasized that she had nothing to do with the case, and her lawsuit speculates that the news outlets used statements from the Fox Nation docuseries and misattributed them to her.
There has been no immediate comment from Accelerate360 in response to the lawsuit. Sheindlin, known for hosting the syndicated “Judge Judy” until 2021 and now hosting “Judy Justice,” did not specify a monetary amount for damages in the lawsuit but made it clear that fabricating stories about her for financial gain would have consequences. She stated, “When you fabricate stories about me in order to make money for yourselves with no regard for the truth or the reputation I’ve spent a lifetime cultivating, it’s going to cost you.” Sheindlin’s lawsuit appears to be a response to what she perceives as a repeated disregard for her reputation and truth by the media outlets.
This lawsuit is not the first time Sheindlin has taken legal action against the National Enquirer. In 2017, the newspaper retracted and apologized for stories that falsely claimed she suffered from Alzheimer’s disease, depression, and had cheated on her husband. Sheindlin’s lawsuit against the parent company of the National Enquirer and InTouch Weekly suggests a pattern of false reporting and misinformation surrounding her personal life and professional reputation. By taking legal action, she aims to hold these media outlets accountable for spreading false information about her.
The lawsuit filed by Sheindlin against the National Enquirer and InTouch Weekly highlights the importance of protecting one’s reputation and addressing false or misleading information spread by media outlets. Sheindlin’s statement regarding the lawsuit emphasizes the financial implications for those who engage in fabricating stories for profit, stating that the consequences must be significant in order to deter such behavior. By pursuing legal action, Sheindlin seeks to defend her reputation and hold those responsible for spreading false information about her accountable.
The lawsuit involving “Judge Judy” Sheindlin and the parent company of the National Enquirer and InTouch Weekly raises questions about the ethics and accountability of media outlets when reporting on public figures. It serves as a reminder of the potential consequences of spreading false information for financial gain and the importance of verifying sources and facts before publishing stories. Sheindlin’s decision to take legal action demonstrates her commitment to defending her reputation and seeking justice in response to the false claims made by the media outlets. The outcome of this lawsuit could have implications for how media outlets report on public figures and the consequences they may face for spreading false information.
In conclusion, the lawsuit filed by “Judge Judy” Sheindlin against the parent company of the National Enquirer and InTouch Weekly is a response to false claims made in a story that she was trying to help the Menendez brothers get a retrial. Sheindlin denies any involvement in the case and seeks to hold the media outlets accountable for spreading false information about her. By pursuing legal action, she aims to defend her reputation and send a message that fabricating stories for profit will have serious consequences. This lawsuit highlights the importance of verifying sources and facts before publishing stories about public figures and raises questions about the ethics and accountability of media outlets in reporting. Sheindlin’s decision to take legal action demonstrates her commitment to seeking justice and addressing false claims made by the media.
