Former Marine Corps Gen. John Kelly, Donald Trump’s former White House chief of staff, revealed in a recent interview with The New York Times that Trump demonstrated a dictatorial approach to government and occasionally made troubling comments. Kelly stated that Trump had expressed admiration for dictators and believed in a centralized autocracy. Kelly also mentioned that Trump struggled to understand why people would serve in the military and had derogatory remarks about service members who had sacrificed their lives for their country. Trump’s campaign responded to Kelly’s interview by dismissing his claims as “debunked” and “fabricated.”
Kelly also revealed that Trump was averse to being seen alongside amputee veterans and would often comment that it did not look good for him. Additionally, Kelly stated that Trump had made remarks about Adolf Hitler having done some good things, which he found troubling given the historical context. Kelly observed that Trump preferred a dictatorial approach to governance, where he could issue commands without regard for legalities. Vice President Kamala Harris condemned Trump’s remarks and expressed concern about his desire for unchecked power, as recalled by Kelly.
As Trump’s chief of staff from July 2017 to January 2019, Kelly was privy to many of Trump’s reactions and behaviors. He noted that Trump had a tendency to admire authoritarian leaders and favored a style of governing that marginalized opposition. Kelly’s exposure to Trump’s perspectives led him to consider Trump as falling within the general definition of a fascist, based on his authoritarian, far-right tendencies. Kelly’s comments shed light on Trump’s leadership style and his views on various issues, including the military and historical figures like Hitler.
The revelation of Trump’s comments about service members and disabled veterans drew significant attention, particularly as the 2020 presidential election was approaching. Trump’s alleged disparaging remarks raised concerns about his respect for those who serve in the military. The contrast between Trump’s public image and his reported private comments created a divide in how he was perceived by the public. Kelly’s decision to speak out about his experiences with Trump sparked debates about the former president’s character and values.
Kelly’s accounts provided a rare glimpse into the inner workings of the Trump administration, revealing tensions and controversial statements made by the former president. The discussion surrounding Trump’s comments about Hitler, service members, and disabled veterans prompted reflections on his leadership style and moral compass. Kelly’s willingness to speak out against his former boss raised questions about the ethical responsibilities of individuals who serve in high-ranking positions in government. His revelations added to a broader narrative about the Trump administration’s policies and decision-making processes, shaping public perceptions of Trump’s legacy.
