As the presidential election approaches, some soon-to-be newlyweds are taking precautionary steps to avoid potential conflicts during their wedding celebrations close to Election Day. One couple, Katie Newell and Elijah Gallinger, in Illinois, have decided to implement a wedding booze ban to prevent any heated political debates among their guests. They expressed concern that serving alcohol on Election Day may lead to distractions amid incoming news or even prevent some people from voting. The couple decided that “not having liquid truth running through people’s veins on Election Day” might be a good idea to prevent potential confrontations as the votes roll in.
Judge Jeanine Pirro, co-host of “The Five,” criticized the decision to ban alcohol at weddings close to the election, arguing that it was merely an excuse to save money. She suggested that if people were going to fight about politics, they would do so with or without a drink. Pirro advised couples to be selective with their guest list and not invite individuals who might start a fight. While co-host Dana Perino recommended eloping as an alternative to hosting a wedding so close to the election, Jesse Watters agreed with the decision to have no booze at his wedding if it were to take place in October, citing his mother’s behavior after a drink.
In contrast, another couple from Massachusetts, Shannon Hendrickson and Drew Fitzmaurice, are getting married just before the election on Nov. 2. Instead of implementing a wedding booze ban, they plan to post signs alerting guests that their wedding is a “no politics zone.” They want to ensure that their special day remains focused on love and celebration, rather than political debates. Hendrickson mentioned that they will make it clear to their guests that discussing the election can wait until the next day, emphasizing the importance of keeping the wedding free of any political tension.
The decision to ban alcohol at weddings close to the election has sparked a debate on social media, with some supporting the idea as a way to prevent potential conflicts, while others view it as unnecessary or merely a cost-cutting measure. While some couples are opting for a booze ban to avoid political debates, others are taking different approaches to ensure that their weddings remain free of any political tension. Ultimately, each couple must decide what works best for them and their guests to ensure that their wedding day is a joyous and memorable occasion without any unnecessary drama or conflict.
In a time when political tensions are high, it is understandable that some couples may want to avoid potential conflicts during their wedding celebrations. Whether it is implementing a booze ban, creating a “no politics zone,” or being selective with the guest list, there are various ways to ensure that a wedding remains a happy and harmonious occasion for all involved. While some may view these precautions as unnecessary or extreme, each couple must prioritize their own comfort and the well-being of their guests when planning a celebration close to a significant event like the presidential election. Ultimately, the goal is to create a memorable and joyous occasion that brings loved ones together in a spirit of love and unity, regardless of any external factors that may threaten to overshadow the celebration.
