Former President Donald Trump has made false claims that he had to post a bond in order to appeal a $454 million civil fraud judgment against him, implying that it was an unusual requirement imposed by Judge Arthur Engoron. However, the truth is that Trump began the appeal process before posting the bond, and the requirement to post a bond to prevent collection during an appeal is standard practice under New York state law. This requirement is regularly applied in civil cases in the state and is not unusual or unique to Trump’s situation.
The requirement for a bond in civil cases in New York is set out by state law and is a common practice in the legal system. Trump’s claims that this requirement is unfair or corrupt are unfounded and factually inaccurate. Legal experts have confirmed that this process is standard and applied regularly in New York courts, even though the amount of the judgment against Trump was particularly large. Claims that Judge Engoron acted improperly or unfairly in requiring the bond are baseless and unsupported by evidence.
Despite Trump’s assertions that he was being forced to pay for the privilege of appealing a decision, the reality is that posting a bond during an appeal process is a standard procedure in civil cases in New York. Trump’s repeated claims that Judge Engoron is biased or corrupt have no basis in fact. The appeals court did ultimately reduce the amount of the bond that Trump was required to post, but this decision was not unprecedented and is within the court’s discretion.
If Trump had not posted the bond and Attorney General Letitia James had collected on the judgment, and then Trump had won the case on appeal, any collected money would have been returned to him with interest. The decision to require a bond during the appeal process is designed to prevent the collection of large sums of money while a case is still under review. Legal experts have confirmed that this practice is standard procedure in civil cases in New York and is meant to protect the interests of all parties involved in a legal dispute.
In conclusion, Trump’s claims about having to post a bond in order to appeal a civil fraud judgment against him are false and misleading. The requirement to post a bond during an appeal is a standard practice in New York civil cases and is not unique to Trump’s situation. Claims that Judge Engoron acted improperly or unfairly in requiring the bond are unfounded, as legal experts have confirmed that this process is standard and regularly applied in New York courts. Trump’s repeated attacks on the legal system and the judge involved in his case are baseless and lack factual support.
