The European Parliament is set to vote on a stricter asylum policy after eight years of debate. The EU is looking to implement new regulations with regards to asylum, which will need to be approved by a simple majority in the Parliament. However, many Green and Socialist members are not happy with the proposed changes.
Green Party member Julian Pahlke has criticized the EU asylum reform ahead of the vote. He believes that the reform does not address key challenges and lacks a reliable system for distributing migrants, leaving frontline countries to deal with the issue alone. Pahlke also argues that the conservative solution is doomed to fail and raises concerns about infringements on the right to asylum.
The EU Parliament is set to vote on the asylum reform, which includes mandatory uniform border procedures for countries at the EU’s external borders. Incoming individuals from countries deemed safe may be placed in controlled reception centers under strict conditions. Their asylum applications will be processed within twelve weeks, and if unsuccessful, they will be swiftly deported. The reform also includes a new mechanism for distributing migrants among EU states, with provisions for sanctions against countries that refuse to participate.
Bundesinnenministerin Nancy Faeser has urged EU Parliament members to support the asylum reform, stressing the importance of Europe demonstrating its ability to manage migration effectively. She highlights the need for strong border protection and orderly asylum procedures to prevent exploitation by populist groups. Faeser also emphasizes the necessity of national border controls, particularly during events like the upcoming European Football Championship.
Faeser argues that under the new EU system, all migrants will undergo strict registration and control procedures at the external borders. Those with low chances of receiving asylum will undergo legal proceedings at the borders and will be returned if their applications are rejected. This approach, she believes, is crucial for protecting individuals at risk from war and terrorism. The new regulations aim to strike a balance between border security and humanitarian assistance.
The impending vote on the EU asylum reform has sparked debate and calls for action from various political factions. While some believe the proposed changes are necessary for managing migration effectively, others criticize them for failing to address key issues and potentially infringing on individuals’ rights. The outcome of the vote will have far-reaching implications for Europe’s approach to asylum and migration in the future.
