A controversial tribunal ruling in Frankston has sparked mixed reactions in the community. While some residents are disappointed and feel that the development will detract from the charm of the area, Urban DC owner Danny Ciarma sees the decision as a positive step forward for housing options in Frankston. He believes that the ruling will increase confidence among developers and buyers, with many already expressing interest in the project. The development, which has been dubbed the “Great Wall of Frankston” by opponents, has faced criticism for being exposed to rising sea levels and inundation. However, Ciarma argues that the site is on higher ground compared to other properties in lower-lying areas of Frankston.
The tribunal’s decision to approve the 13-storey Harbour building has been met with praise from Frankston Mayor Nathan Conroy, who believes that the development will bring much-needed foot traffic to the city center. He also highlights the importance of greater housing diversity in the area. The tribunal noted that Frankston City Council had previously approved an 11-storey mixed-use development nearby, indicating that similar tall buildings have already been accepted in the area. This decision aligns with newly gazetted planning controls that stated a “preferred” 12-storey height limit for the Nepean Highway strip in Frankston.
Members of the community campaign “Stop the Great Wall of Frankston” have been vocal about their opposition to the tall buildings, expressing concern about the impact on the area’s amenity. The development has sparked debate about the future of Frankston and the balance between preserving its character and encouraging urban growth. Planning Minister Sonya Kilkenny initially announced a ban on buildings above three storeys along the Nepean Highway, only to reverse the decision three months later. While the tribunal ruling may have disappointed some residents, it has been welcomed by others who see it as a positive development for the city.
The controversy surrounding the Harbour building highlights the complex issues surrounding urban development and planning decisions in growing communities like Frankston. While some view the tall buildings as a positive step towards increased housing options and economic growth, others fear the impact on the area’s character and amenity. As cities continue to expand and evolve, finding a balance between development and preservation becomes crucial. The tribunal’s decision, along with the support from Mayor Nathan Conroy, signals a shift towards embracing taller buildings and greater housing diversity in Frankston, despite the opposition from some members of the community.
Overall, the tribunal ruling on the Harbour building in Frankston has sparked a debate about the future direction of the city and the balance between growth and preservation. While some residents are disappointed by the decision, others see it as an opportunity to enhance housing options and revitalize the city center. The controversy surrounding the development reflects larger questions about urban planning and the competing interests of different stakeholders. As Frankston continues to evolve, finding ways to accommodate growth while maintaining the character and charm of the area will be a key challenge for decision-makers and community members alike.
