Australian influencer Suzan Mutesi, known for her elaborate outfits and striking red carpet appearances, has once again come under fire for her heavily edited social media presence. Snark Instagram account Before After Influencers recently shared side-by-side comparisons of Suzan’s unedited photos and the polished versions she shares online. These comparisons showcase drastic alterations made to Suzan’s appearance, such as airbrushed skin, enhanced features, and a more sculpted look achieved through photo editing. Critics have called out Suzan for persistently using editing apps to present a digitally altered version of herself.
In one example, Suzan was seen wearing an African-inspired ensemble with a wide-brimmed head-wrap. The ‘before’ image captured her natural look with subtle makeup and texture in her skin, while the edited version showed airbrushed skin, enhanced contours, and a more sculpted jawline. Another comparison featured Suzan at the Australian movie premiere of Barbie in a hot pink mini-dress. The unedited image showed her fresh but natural makeup, while the edited version had a digitally altered figure with a chiselled nose, fuller lips, and smoother skin. Followers have expressed shock and criticism over Suzan’s consistent use of editing to alter her appearance.
Suzan has shared insights into her photo editing process, attributing the need for editing to poor lighting situations at red carpet events. She mentioned using apps like FaceTune and Photoshop on her iPhone to enhance her images, particularly to adjust for shadows and dark lighting that can impact the quality of photographs. Suzan emphasized the importance of good foundation and camera settings for creating the best shots and acknowledged using editing apps like FaceTune and Photoshop to enhance her red carpet pictures. She explained that her editing choices are influenced by the need to compensate for poor lighting conditions and to highlight features like her eyes in order to improve the overall look of her photos.
Despite facing criticism for her heavily edited social media presence, Suzan continues to defend her use of editing apps to enhance her images. She explained that editing apps like FaceTune and Photoshop are essential tools for her to achieve the desired look she wants to present on social media. Suzan also mentioned using ProRAW settings on her iPhone to optimize photo quality and highlighted her go-to editing app as FaceTune, which she uses to adjust for poor lighting situations at events. She clarified that while she understands the importance of good settings for photography, editing apps play a significant role in improving the overall quality of her red carpet photos.
Suzan’s use of extreme photo editing has sparked controversy and led to accusations of presenting a false image on social media. Critics have raised concerns about Suzan’s reliance on editing apps like FaceTune and Photoshop to alter her appearance, questioning the authenticity of her online persona. Despite facing backlash, Suzan has defended her editing choices, attributing them to the need to compensate for poor lighting conditions and emphasize her features in photos. The ongoing debate surrounding Suzan’s heavily edited social media presence highlights the challenges and complexities of maintaining authenticity and transparency in the influencer industry, where image manipulation has become a common practice.
