Malaysian authorities recently carried out the eviction of more than 500 Bajau Laut sea nomads in Sabah state in order to enhance security measures and combat cross-border crime. The Bajau Laut, a stateless sea-faring community, typically live on houseboats or coastal huts built on stilts, saw their homes demolished or burned by enforcement officials in the Semporna district. Despite criticism from rights groups, the government defended the operation as necessary to tackle illegal activities such as fishing, building structures, and farming without permission in protected areas controlled by Sabah Parks.
Sabah’s minister of tourism, culture, and environment, Christina Liew, emphasized the importance of upholding the country’s laws and reiterated that authorities have the right to take action against unauthorized activities. Evacuation notices were reportedly sent to 273 settlements last month, with 138 structures being destroyed in “hot spots” around the Tun Sakaran Marine Park. This marine park is a popular tourism destination known for its diving spots, and authorities want to ensure that the area is not compromised by illegal activities carried out by the Bajau Laut community.
Despite the government’s justification for the evictions, local activists have called on the authorities to halt the operation and ensure the safety and protection of the Bajau Laut community. The Bajau Laut, who are predominantly stateless, have faced discrimination and marginalization for generations, and many rely on the sea for their livelihoods. The forced eviction from their homes has raised concerns about their well-being and future prospects, with activists demanding greater respect for the rights and dignity of these sea nomads.
The operation in Sabah has sparked debate and controversy, with human rights groups questioning the legality and morality of the evictions. Some argue that the government’s actions may violate the rights of the Bajau Laut community, particularly in terms of their property rights and right to shelter. Critics have called for a more humane and inclusive approach that takes into consideration the cultural and historical significance of the Bajau Laut’s way of life, rather than resorting to forced removals and destruction of their homes.
As the situation unfolds, it remains to be seen how the Malaysian authorities will respond to the criticism and calls for halting the eviction of the Bajau Laut community. The issue raises broader questions about the treatment of marginalized and vulnerable communities in the country, as well as the need for more sustainable and inclusive policies that respect the rights and dignity of all individuals, regardless of their background or status. The fate of the Bajau Laut and their struggle for recognition and protection will continue to be a focal point for activists and advocates working towards a more just and equitable society in Malaysia.
