Greg Schiano, the head coach of the Rutgers Scarlet Knights, made a controversial decision during a game against Howard. With a significant lead of 38-7 and just 15 seconds left on the clock, Schiano chose not to take a knee to end the game. Instead, he ran the ball twice, scoring a touchdown as time expired. The final score was 44-7, with Rutgers opting not to kick the extra point. This decision had a significant impact on spread bettors, as some books had the line set at 36.5 in favor of Rutgers. Schiano’s handshake with Howard’s coach, Larry Scott, was tense, with Scott expressing his frustration with the playcall. Despite not revealing what was said, Schiano defended his decision, stating that the players deserved to play and that it was not an attempt to run up the score.
Schiano’s decision to continue playing and score a touchdown in the closing seconds of the game sparked debate and controversy. While Scott expressed his frustration with how the situation was handled, he acknowledged that both coaches are competitive individuals. Schiano, on the other hand, remained unapologetic, denying that he was running up the score. He emphasized the importance of giving the players an opportunity to play after practicing hard during training camp and defended his choice to continue running plays instead of letting the clock run out. The incident brought back memories of a similar situation in 2012 when Schiano, then coaching the Tampa Bay Buccaneers, instructed his team to keep fighting until the game was officially over, leading to a clash with the New York Giants.
These events highlight the competitive nature of college football and the varying opinions on how to handle situations where one team has a significant lead late in the game. While some believe in running out the clock and showing sportsmanship, others, like Schiano, argue that players who have put in the effort and practice deserve the opportunity to play. The controversy surrounding the decision to score a late touchdown against Howard has reignited discussions about sportsmanship and ethical conduct in football. Despite the differing opinions on the matter, both coaches involved, Schiano and Scott, are respected individuals in the college football community, with successful coaching careers and a commitment to their players’ development and success.
As the debate over the late-game touchdown continues, college football stars have unanimously shared their thoughts on the upcoming 12-team college football playoff. The expansion of the playoff system has been a hot topic in the college football world, with many players and coaches expressing support for the change. The new format will allow more teams to compete for the national championship and provide additional opportunities for student-athletes to showcase their talent on a bigger stage. The unanimous support from college football stars for the 12-team playoff reflects a general positive outlook on the future of the sport and the benefits that the expanded playoff system will bring for teams, players, and fans alike.
The controversy surrounding the decision to continue playing and score a late touchdown against Howard underscores the complexities of coaching and competition in college football. While some may view Schiano’s choice as questionable or unsportsmanlike, others see it as a way to reward players for their hard work and dedication. Regardless of differing opinions, the incident has sparked important conversations about sportsmanship, ethics, and the competitive nature of college football. Moving forward, it will be essential for coaches, players, and fans to continue to uphold the values of fair play and respect while also recognizing the passion and determination that drive the game. Ultimately, the debate over the late-game touchdown serves as a reminder of the diverse perspectives and approaches that shape the world of college football and the ongoing quest for excellence and sportsmanship in the sport.
