Executives from the New York Police Department have taken to social media platform X to launch personal attacks against individuals they feel have criticized or disrespected the department. Chief of Patrol John Chell criticized a newspaper columnist and a lawyer and political activist, while also engaging in online disputes with other figures. This combative behavior, while supported by Mayor Eric Adams, has been seen as a departure from typical police protocol and has raised concerns among former city officials about the department’s public image.
A recent target of the department’s online attacks has been columnist Harry Siegel, whose critical column on department leadership and crime on the subway sparked a series of responses branding him as “deceitful” and disparaging his character. The police also falsely accused a judge of releasing a felon who went on to commit another crime, and Chief Chell criticized The New York Times for not featuring coverage of a fallen officer’s funeral on the front page. The aggressive behavior on social media has drawn criticism from some quarters for the lack of professionalism and control it displays.
Commissioner Edward A. Caban expressed understanding for his executives’ passionate defense of their bureaus, implying that they feel undervalued by the media. However, the online attacks have led to concerns about the department’s leadership and the lack of control over its messaging. Former Police Commissioner William J. Bratton noted that social media has removed barriers for institutions like the Police Department, leading to unfiltered outbursts that may not be in the department’s best interest.
The department’s media engagement unit oversees the social media presence of police executives and precinct commanders, ensuring correct information is disseminated. Deputy Commissioner Tarik Sheppard supported the executives’ posts criticizing Mr. Siegel, stating there was nothing unprofessional about pointing out errors. However, concerns remain about the department’s aggressive stance on social media and the impact it may have on public perception.
Some individuals, such as Mike Colón and Harry Siegel, have spoken out against the department’s attacks, with Siegel feeling that the executives are trying to intimidate him into silence. Despite this, the department’s social media accounts have continued to engage in aggressive behavior, including name-calling and personal attacks. The online disputes have highlighted a shifting landscape in communication for institutions like the Police Department, which must navigate the balance between freedom of speech and professionalism in the digital age.
While Mayor Eric Adams has supported the department’s stance on social media, not everyone agrees with the approach taken by the executives. Concerns have been raised about the lack of control over messaging and the perception of a leadership structure that is not effectively managing public relations. As the department continues to engage in online disputes and criticism, the impact on public trust and perception remains to be seen.
