Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey is filing a lawsuit against the state of New York for what he believes is an attack on the democratic process through unconstitutional actions against former President Trump. Bailey stated that he will be taking steps to combat what he calls illicit prosecutions against Trump, emphasizing the need to restore the rule of law and fight back against what he sees as an attempt to rig the 2024 election. The lawsuit will go straight to the U.S. Supreme Court because it is a state versus state action and will be titled “Missouri vs. New York.” Bailey has previously probed the Justice Department for documents related to any communications with prosecutors connected to the indictments of Trump, alleging that the investigations and prosecutions of the former president were conducted in coordination with the DOJ.
Bailey alleges that the third-highest ranking DOJ official, Matthew Colangelo, moved to the Manhattan DA’s office to help prosecute the criminal case against Trump, indicating coordination between the DOJ and state prosecutors. He also points out that Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg worked alongside New York Attorney General Letitia James in pursuing civil litigation against Trump and campaigned on a promise to go after Trump. Bailey argues that Bragg’s decision to bring charges against Trump, despite their alleged weakness, has kept the former president off the campaign trail, which President Biden has allegedly bragged about. Bailey suspects coordination between the Biden administration and state prosecutors in bringing prosecutions against Trump, based on the timing of the charges.
The Missouri Attorney General’s lawsuit against New York aims to combat what Bailey sees as a direct attack on the democratic process and the rights of Missourians to a free and fair election. He accuses radical progressives in New York of attempting to sabotage the upcoming election by targeting Trump with what he views as unjust prosecutions. Bailey emphasizes the need to stand up and fight back against what he perceives as a rogue prosecutor trying to interfere with a presidential candidate. His office notes that the lawsuit will be titled “Missouri vs. New York” and will be escalated to the U.S. Supreme Court due to it being a state versus state action. Bailey has also previously probed the Justice Department for documents related to communications with prosecutors involved in the indictments of Trump, suggesting possible coordination in the investigations and prosecutions.
Bailey criticizes the actions taken by New York prosecutors against Trump, accusing them of attempting to keep the former president off the campaign trail by bringing what he sees as weak charges against him. He points out the move of a high-ranking DOJ official to the Manhattan DA’s office to help prosecute Trump, as well as the collaboration between the Manhattan DA and the New York Attorney General in pursuing civil litigation against Trump. Bailey alleges that these actions have effectively prevented Trump from engaging in political campaigning, which he believes has had an impact on the democratic process. He suggests that there may have been coordination between the Biden administration and state prosecutors to bring charges against Trump, based on the timing of the indictments and their impact on Trump’s ability to campaign.
Bailey’s lawsuit against New York is motivated by his belief that the actions taken against Trump are unconstitutional and represent an attack on the democratic process. He argues that the investigations and prosecutions of Trump were conducted in coordination with the U.S. Department of Justice, highlighting the involvement of high-ranking DOJ officials in the criminal case against Trump. Bailey also raises concerns about the collaboration between the Manhattan DA and the New York Attorney General in pursuing legal actions against Trump, alleging that these actions have kept Trump off the campaign trail. He suggests that the timing and legitimacy of the charges, as well as their impact on Trump’s ability to campaign, indicate potential coordination between state prosecutors and the Biden administration in targeting Trump. Bailey is determined to fight against what he perceives as an attempt to rig the 2024 election and ensure that Missourians have the right to a free and fair election.
In conclusion, the Missouri Attorney General’s lawsuit against the state of New York aims to push back against what Andrew Bailey sees as unconstitutional and unjust actions targeting former President Trump. Bailey alleges coordination between state prosecutors and the U.S. Department of Justice in investigating and prosecuting Trump, leading to what he believes is an attack on the democratic process. He accuses New York prosecutors of trying to keep Trump off the campaign trail by bringing what he views as weak charges against him, with potential coordination with the Biden administration. Bailey is committed to fighting back against these actions and ensuring that the rights of Missourians to a free and fair election are upheld.
