Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas addressed critics and pushed back on the “nastiness” and “lies” directed at him during a judicial conference in Alabama. He dismissed the idea that his jurisprudence required courage, stating that he was simply doing his job and that true courage was exhibited by servicemembers, firefighters, and bomb defusers. Thomas lamented the negativity and recklessness of people in Washington, noting that they can do just as much harm to one’s reputation as a physical attack.
Speaking at the 11th US Circuit Court of Appeals conference, Thomas emphasized the importance of making decisions with a lifetime appointment that are the right decisions, as a way of honoring soldiers and first responders. He did not directly address recent reports about ethics issues that have plagued him, but he did speak about the personal attacks and criticism he and his wife have faced in recent years. Thomas and his wife Ginni have been targeted by critics, with calls for his recusal from cases related to the January 6 Capitol attack due to Ginni’s involvement in efforts to reverse the 2020 election results.
Criticism of Thomas has also focused on his acceptance of private jet travel and vacations from Republican megadonor Harlan Crow. In response to the backlash, Thomas updated his financial disclosure forms and the Supreme Court adopted a code of conduct for the first time last year. Thomas shared a story about taking a walk with a friend, expressing concern that his friends may be targeted next by his critics. He also expressed his disdain for Washington, DC, criticizing the culture of pride in being “awful” and harmful actions.
Thomas has faced ongoing attacks and criticism in recent years, with a focus on his wife’s involvement in political activities and his personal relationships. Despite the challenges, Thomas remains committed to his role on the Supreme Court and making decisions that he believes are the right ones. He continues to push back against his critics and defend his reputation and honor, while also emphasizing the importance of staying true to his duties as a justice. The controversy surrounding Thomas reflects broader issues of ethics, transparency, and public perception of the judicial system.
